PK2K - Visual Arts
  • Home
  • Work
    • Ephemeral Congo
    • Drawings
    • Collage
    • Abstracts
    • Altered books
    • Landscapes
    • Mylar portraits
    • Other paintings
    • Rainy/foggy/snowy
    • Reflections on Windows
    • Photos
  • PK's Blog
  • Congo trip
  • Artist Statement
  • Contact

Documentaries about artists 18 - Rivers and Tides

10/11/2020

0 Comments

 
Andy Goldsworthy, a Scottish artist, mesmerizes with installations, sculptures and drawings in nature that incorporate rocks, stones, ice, leaves, branches, driftwood - to name a few. Watching this 2001 documentary, Rivers and Tides, ‘wow’ kept coming to mind as he creates art that would be easy enough for many to produce on their own.
This is one of the better artist documentaries because Goldsworthy speaks understandably and extensively about his work. His explanations illustrate his process - and you can understand what he is saying. One of the longer sections is about a country wall of stone he created at the Storm King Art Center in New York. It is a wall that incorporates his signature imagery, the wandering movement of a river. He wraps the wall around trees, as well as having it enter and exit a lake. It loses its standard straight line and enters a conversation with the trees and landscape in which it sits. Though a wall is meant to last, in his mind it remains ephemeral because it explicitly acknowledges that tree growth will eventually destroy it - much like the previous wall that had been present on the property.

The most impressive river flow imagery piece is from Nova Scotia where he attaches pieces of icicle to a rock by the ocean - then the sun appears in a fortunate way to light it up completely to make it glow. We get to share his surprise at the beauty of it when it happens.

Time is another major player in his work. He often creates on the seashore, completing his works just as the tide comes in - which then destroys them. Working in ice also acknowledges plays into the ephemeral nature of his work. Whether gone in a moment in the flow of a river or lasting longer because it is made of stone, his work is designed to disappear, something that sets his work apart.

His signature works are human sized pinecone shaped sculptures using stone, ice, wood - and probably other objects given the frequency he has made them. They are impressive because they stand on their own with nothing attaching the pieces together - and they can be fragile. One of the compelling moments is when he builds one of these cones from rocks on the seashore but it falls four times before he is able to get it to stand - all while the tide is coming in. It is rare to see an artist fail on camera, but this film captures two such episodes and his reaction of disappointment, making him that more human.

The wow moments come from the fact that anyone could do what he does. He has taken childhood play with stones, sticks and other objects from the natural world and continued the journey into art - without losing the childhood playfulness, and while remaining fully conscious of the meaning he brings to his work.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 17 - The 100 Years Show

8/15/2020

0 Comments

 
In 2005, 89 year-old Carmen Herrera had her breakthrough exhibit that led to art world stardom. Although recognition came late in life, she had been working at her art constantly since her 20s.

The 100 Years Show, released in the year of her 100th birthday in 2015 shows the still vibrant and productive artist - with a zest for life and no intention of stopping. In 2020, she celebrated her 105th birthday - her remarkable and remarkably long life continues.

The documentary shows her at work, going through her process of idea to sketch to proof of concept to full blown artwork. While still hands on, her assistant is there to help her complete her works, many of which are large scale.

Her abstract minimalist paintings have the power to make the viewer stop to contemplate their elegant simplicity. Her early works already demonstrate her talent. The further decades of work have strengthened her skills as she continues her daily search to create powerful art.

Her positive attitude to art and life are remarkable given the almost complete absence of opportunities and recognition for so many decades. She kept going. As she says, when you wait for the bus, the bus will eventually come. Certainly, there has been a lot pain in her waiting, including being told by a woman gallery owner in the 1950s that she would not show her work because Carmen was a woman. She has not forgotten, but she persisted.

This half hour documentary effectively shows Carmen Herrera at work in her home studio, her process and explanations of her life and art. Unfortunately, because of its shortness, it does not delve into the source of her inspiration and how she came to focus on line and colour. It may be a factor of her not being able to explain it well, rather hard to imagine given her ease explaining so much of her life to the camera. Certainly, enough is known of her early life and initial architectural studies to be able to map out where her artistic interests began and how they evolved.

There are few unequivocal feel good stories in life. This is definitely one. The doggedness of an artist continuing to produce while being ignored, and then attaining recognition in her ninth decade of life is a story hard to even imagine as being within the realm of realistic possibility. 

As a final exclamation point, she has gone through life with a smile and without bitterness. She deserves all the belated fame she has received.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 16 - Maya Lin: A Clear Strong Vision

3/1/2020

0 Comments

 
Maya Lin leapt into the public eye as a 21 year-old architecture student who won the competition to design the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington in 1980. Maya Lin: A Clear Strong Vision follows the first ten years of her career beginning with this incredible project win over 1,000+ other submissions.

Her design is a feat that changed war memorials from glorification of state power and politicians to a solemn, personalized recognition of those who died. While I have never been to the Memorial, I have distinct images of people moved to tears just by going there, and in many cases, simply seeing and touching the name of a loved one or comrade with whom they served. 

She shifted the paradigm for war memorials by doing two things. First, she included the names of all those who died, which was a requirement of the competition, but she found a way to make every single name legible. Second, she changed the direction from vertical to horizontal,  a brilliant way to incorporate the required 50,000+ names. 

In my mind, I compare this memorial with the four war memorials within walking distance of where I live. They are all vertically-oriented, meant to inspire awe rather than personal connection. One of them actually includes the names of people who fought, but that wall is behind a fence, which means the public is not welcome to approach and touch. 

This paradigm shift is even more remarkable considering that the Vietnam War had ended in defeat and shame for the Americans a few short years before the competition and building of the memorial. Emotions ran incredibly high following the announcement of her winning design. Criticism went well beyond the design itself and became personal, including attacks on her gender and ethnic background. Her parents are Chinese immigrants. In the face of the controversy, she held her ground. She was pressured to compromise her design but she remained  steadfast. And she was right. This is confirmed towards the end of the movie, when she attended a Memorial Day service at the monument ten years after its inauguration. The veterans gave her a standing ovation following her remarks.

Following her meteoric entrance at the intersection of architecture, design and art, her career has never slowed. One of her next projects highlighted was a memorial to civil rights in Montgomery, Alabama - the birthplace of the Klu Klux Klan. As with the Vietnam Memorial, she created a design that invites the viewers to touch and approach, this time it is like a round table with key dates and names with water flowing over it. At its opening, everyone crowded by the edge and touched the writing, and I know I would want to do the same thing. Her public architecture is participatory, you are meant to approach and touch. That is an essential part of the process for the full emotional impact to be experienced.

Following that memorial, she designed a house, a museum, an outdoor reflection area in a park and a monument to women at Yale. I especially liked her work during a museum residency creating an installation of tons of crushed glass that ventures into visual art. 

The title really sums up the person - she has a strong, clear vision. To this day, her work remains fresh, simple, elegant and original. She has definite themes and interests without a sense of repetition. Extensive interviews where she explains her creative process round out the real time execution of some of her projects in the documentary that brings her process alive.

If she had only designed the Vietnam Memorial, that would have already been enough to be considered a great artist. Her continued production for now more than 40 years attests to a vibrant creative force that continues to burn strong. 
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 15 - Sky Ladder

5/6/2019

0 Comments

 
If there is one artist in the world who is identified with a medium, it’s Cai Guo-Qiang and gunpowder. Over the years, he has used it to draw (on canvas as well as in the sky), for performance as well as conceptual art. He’s even used it for pretty standard - if grandiose - fireworks shows.

Sky Ladder uses the story of him accomplishing a lifelong dream to create a sky ladder - inspired by a Christian tradition of a stairway to heaven (also a 1970s rock anthem). With that story working largely as the bookends, the movie explores his early life prior to and during the Cultural Revolution in China. His father had made their home a centre for artistic discussion as well as himself being a successful painter. Relatively early in his career, Cai moved to Japan and then further afield, especially now that he has become an international art star. 

The movie touches on themes such as the influence of traditional Chinese art on his work, his connection with his father and grandmother - both of whom were still alive if very frail at the time of filming, the ethics of working on projects sponsored by the Chinese government such as fireworks at the Beijing Olympics and 2014 APEC conference. Another interesting theme is how to keep your art fresh when the struggle to make it is over - he now has access to significant resources to carry out projects but seeks out obscure artists integrate to integrate their ideas and energy. Visiting one such obscure artist, he comments that ‘compulsive and sincere emotion that should exist in all art’ - in some way that sums up his quest, in some ways harder now that he can easily access financial investment in his artwork.

The highpoint of the movie is definitely the creation of his Sky Ladder at a Chinese fishing village near his family’s ancestral home. It is a thing of wonder and beauty to behold before for the few minutes of its life, stretching 500 metres into the sky just before dawn breaks. The long and quixotic journey to carry out his dream came true. He dedicated the work to his grandmother who would die a month later. Making the project even more challenging was the fact that he hid it from government authorities. The third attempt - England, the United States and then China - finally succeeded.

While the sky ladder theme holds the film together, the abundance of other themes left me wanting for more than soundbites. Although the arc of his career was drawn, I really wanted to hear him speak about his work more in-depth and explain what he has been trying to say through his gunpowder and other works. While there are many times he talks about his life, I really didn’t hear enough about his very original art.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 14 - Obey Giant

10/13/2018

0 Comments

 
Shepard Fairey rose to public fame and consciousness with his Obama ‘Hope’ poster leading up to the 2008 American presidential election. Obey Giant tells the story of Fairey’s road to fame and celebrity with the Obama poster being the tipping point.

A non-academically inclined high school student, he finally came into his own by studying art. Even at art school, subversion of political posters started in a big way by him posting the face of Andre the Giant over a mayoral candidate’s face on a billboard as part of a class assignment. 

Andre the Giant was certainly his main obsession and vehicle for many years, eventually he incorporated the words ‘Obey Giant’ into the imagery to become his artistic trademark. Behind this obsession was the anti-mainstream questioning of ownership of the public space - by government and corporations through advertising - or by other voices. Street art was not just a vandalism game for him. 

And so he went about his underground activities of posting decals based on Andre the Giant and postering. He came out from the street art underground with the Obama poster. Creating that poster was a conscious decision to take part in partisan politics rather than just railing against the 'system' and it redirected his career. He felt he could no longer stand on the sidelines and criticize. He needed to stand up for what he believed in. The poster was not commissioned, the Obama campaign never brought him on board and he let anyone use it - foregoing any financial benefit.

This career changing decision led him in directions that the documentary follows, and it continues to play out until the present. The portrait became iconic and hangs in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington. The documentary follows the upward and downward directions his career took. As a result of of his Obama portrait, he had his first major gallery show in Boston, where on opening night he was arrested because of some of the graffiti works he had been doing in the city while there. He was accused of damaging public property. A spirit-crushing legal journey lasted many months. Then the more complicated case came up with Associated Press suing him for using one of their pictures as the source for his Obama portrait, which had the potential to bankrupt him even though he never benefited financially. Again, months of legal hell ensued before AP finally dropping the case.

At this point of his career, his exploration of ownership of the public space evolved. He was now famous and generating significant revenue through his work. he was commissioned to paint murals. He became involved in partisan politics and progressive positions, especially in the Trump era. His aesthetic has evolved, with posters and murals that have taken his Obama look into something much more based on a design look, which was already an element of his work, but is now more present as part of the more polished look of his work.

Following the completion of this documentary, he has definitely chosen to move away from his counter-cultural vibe - he recently opened up an Obey Giant clothing store on the Champs Elysées in Paris. His work has become more beautiful than edgy.

Obey Giant’s strength is its exploration of the street art scene and its existential questioning of ownership of the public space. Given the superstar reality of Fairey today, it also covers his development and initial inspirations, which have continued into his current work. At a visceral level. the documentary delivers an understanding of the risks street artists take. Fairey describes his arrests, which have involved police violence but also included the refusal to give him access to his medication for type 1 diabetes - his health and even his life were at risk because of the arrests. So being a street artist had real and significant consequences for him, even leaving aside the court cases brought against him.

It is interesting to contrast Fairey’s career with Banksy’s, probably the world’s two best known street artists. Banksy has continued to stay outside and flaunt the artistic and political system - even while those systems try to take possession of his work. He has consistently kept his critiques at a meta level, certainly with regards to politics. Fairey chose to become involved in partisan politics and issues about which he is passionate. Both valid choices. But I feel that over the years, Fairey’s art has weakened. Audience taste now matters to him.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 13 - AS IS by Nick Cave

6/10/2018

0 Comments

 
AS IS by Nick Cave, 2016, follows Nick Cave through a one year residency in Shreveport, Louisiana, as he prepares a vast array of participants for a one-time multimedia performance.

On the positive side, it shows the power of art to involve people at the margins of society. Art can divide people into camps of those who get it and those who don’t but Cave’s project and passion is to involve many in his work - including those who would not view themselves as artists. Specifically, AS IS refers to accepting and meeting people as they are. The first phase of the project involved people with HIV, the homeless, women and children in shelters as well as the mentally ill creating beaded string blankets, each depicting a person’s story. They participated with enthusiasm. A smile came to my face seeing people fully engaged in their art. It’s clear that art became important but also fun for them. In interviews with other project participants, especially young people from schools, choirs and dance troupes later in the documentary, they talked about how much fun they had and how unique the experience was as so many practices were brought together, something that normally would not take place. In the theatre during rehearsals  young children clearly felt at home and given permission to play on the stage, particularly a section that became their slide.

On the downside, the shortcomings led me to think this documentary could have been much more successful. First, I could never understand what was the point of the overall production. The beaded blankets as life stories was clearly in line with meeting people as they are. But I could not make a connection between the other aspects of the performance that involved music, dance and spoken work. An added frustration is that the movie ended without showing the actual performance, we only get up to the final rehearsals. I definitely wanted to see the performance and hear what the local audience had to say about it.

Cave is perfectly suited for such a project as his practice is largely performance. His soundsuits are elaborate costumes used in choreographed sequences and feature prominently in this show’s development and performance. He is also committed to community involvement through art and is clearly gifted at engaging large, disparate groups of people with different practices. One of the best subplots was his ongoing work with the spoken word poet, getting him and his accompanying musician to continuously raise their game through firm, repeated but gentle feedback.

The success of the film is in its showing that art can involve and engage people who see themselves as artists and those who don’t, but who can be energized by the right project. The movie’s shortfall was in not fully describing what that ultimate multimedia project was, as well as not showing the actual performance and the audience reaction to it.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 12 - Cutie and the Boxer

5/9/2018

0 Comments

 
Cutie and the Boxer, 2013, centres on the story of Noriko Shinohara (Cutie) and Ushio Shinohara (the Boxer or Bullie) and how this 40 year marriage of two artists has created a legacy of baggage and resentment, mainly for Noriko.

At one point, she compares their relationship to two flowers living in a single pot. They can fight for nutrients and diminish each other, but at the best of times, they grow together. The film leads us to see Ushio as having taken from the relationship at the service of his career as an internationally well-known visual artist. Unfortunately, he has not transformed his artistic success into financial stability. They live in cramped space, struggling to pay rent and utilities every month while the ceiling leaks. This is due to his impractical nature and history of alcoholism, which their son appears to have copied. He appears to be endowed with only intermittent self-awareness of his impact on his wife, who is 20 years younger than him. Noriko, for her part, sacrificed her artistic aspirations to manage their chaotic household and raise their son.

The narrative centres around the preparations for their first shared show. Ushio has the main room while Noriko takes over a side room with floor to ceiling canvases depicting her relationship with Ushio. It is in a comic book/graphic novel, unflinching in showing the heartache and disappointments of their relationship, particularly the first years that set the stage for her withdrawal from her artistic practice. Her content is raw and unflinching - especially for Ushio, who is called Bullie in the story. His flaws, failings, errors and shortcomings are put on public display. When he sees it, he squirms but does his best to be encouraging. This project appears to be her catharsis and way of getting back her artistic self-esteem. The movie ends with each of them working near each other on their projects in their apartment, suggesting she is ready to resume the career she put on hold.


​The originality of this documentary is in its showing of how an artist couple do
not cooperate. Most other couples we hear about work together, at least for a time. In this case, it never happened and it’s hard to imagine that they will ever work together. Ushio clearly feels superior and is uncomfortable with Noriko being in the same exhibit with him. In his mind, she was his assistant and support - but not an artist. Subtly but clearly highlighting their tension makes the documentary original and poignant.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 11 - Michel Basquiat - The Radiant Child

3/10/2017

0 Comments

 
Jean-Michel Basquiat: The Radiant Child left me with a chicken and egg conundrum. Here’s a text-based graffiti artist, producing postcards and t-shirts to earn at least a few dollars one day and then a gallery owner finances him to produce a body of work because she saw something in him. On opening night, everything sold. Basquiat, then in his early 20s, was $200,000 richer.

Was it his talent or was it the New York art scene that decided he would be the next big thing? Or was it both? I’m conflicted. He was precocious, but was he that good, that important? Part of my conflict about Basquiat is that I don’t really like his work that much, even after having seen it in various museums. 

The documentary helped me understand him and his work, appreciating the electric energy he brought to it. I learned about his use of text, including erasing words in whole in part, and then letting all of that process be seen. I was fascinated by his painting method of having the television on, while also leafing through magazines. He was a multi-tasker before the word existed and that real-time interaction with pop culture was his source material. He responded to what he was experiencing at the moment.

Part of the overall mix of his fame and importance is the fact that he was the first African-American superstar artist, only happening in the 1980s. He explicitly highlighted black culture, history and race issues. 

While clearly smart and talented, he certainly had gaps in his ability to function well in the world. That did not impede his self-awareness, as well as his awareness of the forces that drove his fame as well as the ups and downs in critical favour. He suffered from the inherent questioning of his success and talent as a person of colour. 

Because of the documentary, I can appreciate his talent, energy and innovation in bringing graffiti and street art into the gallery world. But the fundamental question remains, was he a genius or was he made by the powers of the art world? Asking the question obviously puts me in the corner of being made by the art world as so many talents have to work for decades to break through - or not at all. But, many of those interviewed who are world renowned artists, particularly Julian Schnabel, feel that he was an extraordinary talent. So I’m going to have keep struggling with the conundrum. That does not stop me from feeling sympathy for someone who still at a young age could not manage his drug addiction and other demons. It certainly would have been amazing to see his talent evolve over the decades rather than the one decade during which he flourished.
0 Comments

Documentaries about artists 10 - ART21

9/11/2016

1 Comment

 
ART21 - Art in the 21st Century brings you into the art, mind, studio and shows of three contemporary artists in each episode. It offers a chance to see artists at work and get into what is driving them.

ART21 is a PBS show that highlights American artists or those who practice in the United States. It has issued a new season every two years since 2001, with the eighth season coming out in late 2016. Each season is four one-hour episodes, each highlighting three different artists.

Given the sheer number of profiles, some are inevitably better than others. Overall the selection is strong, providing some stunning portraits of artists doing breathtaking work. How can you not be awed by an artist who ignites gunpowder as a way to draw?

Its strength is its ability to capture contemporary artists at work, often as they are putting together and then commenting on a show. I imagine the crew spends an extended period with each artist. As a result, the artists appear at ease in these profiles and usually provide a back story that adds context. But if the work is not all that profound or the artist lacks skills at explaining, that commentary does drag.

On a bittersweet note, hearing some now deceased world famous artists, such as Louise Bourgeois or Nancy Spero, was a good way to better understand their work, which I have not always found easy to approach. As I frequently find their work in in museums, I now have more to draw on to understand their visual language.

Another discovery for me was to see how many African-American artists address the legacy of slavery in hard-hitting ways. The profile of Kara Walker certainly ranks as one of most powerful  She highlights the brutality of slavery by creating shadow puppets, a seemingly benign art form from the period of slavery, but what she depicts is incredibly brutal. Her work can be disturbing, yet I found her the most friendly and approachable of all the artists profiled.

One of the limitations of the series is when the subjects are world famous active artists - Marina Abramovic, Ai Wei Wei - the profiles feel incomplete and reverential. The 20 minute allocation cannot compare with the full length documentaries produced about them and their work. In fairness, given Ai Wei Wei was put under house arrest at the time his profile was being created certainly limited the story they could tell.

Another shortcoming is that while successfully showing a selection of artists from around the globe, the series focuses on American or American-based artists. The series becomes even more downsized. largely to artists based in New York City. Hard to argue with focusing on the world’s art capital, but it does feel limiting that so many work in that environment. 

A final shortcoming is the attempt to find a theme for each episode, such as time, ecology, history, etc. These themes do not really impact the content, but most do not seem to be relevant to the artists profiled. Which is fine, it is enjoyable to take an hour to watch three talented artists talk about their work.

The series has stood the test of time. I look forward to each episode, hoping that I will see something that leaves me amazed. I am usually rewarded, but it’s getting harder to find impressive artists as the years go by.
1 Comment

Documentaries about artists 9 - The Mystery of Picasso

6/28/2015

0 Comments

 
The Mystery of Picasso lets the art do the talking. I had my doubts about it given it was filmed in 1956, but it’s actually the clearest view into the creative process of an artist I have seen to date, almost entirely without words. Unfortunately, the music, like the title, feels poorly chosen and detracts from the viewing experience.

The first part is a series of quick marker and ink drawings. The filmmaker developed a technique showing the drawing developing in real time. Picasso sat and drew on one side of a special cloth and the camera was on the other side, registering every mark he made. The drawings become repetitive but certainly offer a quick first glimpse into his artistic process. The best ones are the most abstract, black lines and circles filling the page, coming alive to acquire depth and vibrancy.

The breathtaking section followed the development of three paintings, with images taken every few minutes. The first is the head of a goat. Starting from a simple, loose line drawing, he worked until it took on an expressive life of its own. What’s most interesting is to see how much he reworked the painting - every single part of it going from light to dark and sometimes back to light, detail to non-detailed, colours changing throughout as well. He was experimenting throughout. The final product is a stunner and in this case, he actually says off camera that it took five hours. It was a jaw-dropper to understand just how much he worked every square inch of the canvas. I assumed that the most famous painter of the twentieth century would know what he wanted when he started a painting and simply carried it out. Given his work appears so loose and quick, I did not think he needed so much trial and error - obviously a false assumption.

The shock only grew with the next painting, a nude woman reading. In this case, the process is even more dramatic, at a certain point he scrapes away all his work and starts over again. In this case, the face was where almost all the effort was concentrated. Seeing the changes and the various moods expressed by each iteration was amazing. At the same time, other parts retained the looseness of the initial sketch. At the final stage, he integrated collaged papers into the painting.

The final painting is an inspiration for all struggling artists. It’s a collection of vignettes of beach scenes - waterskiing, houses, people standing. In this case he worked every single section over and over and over again. One of the central figures is a woman, who never stops changing size and gesture. In this case, even the genius overworked his piece, eventually saying off camera that it’s really going badly and he wants to start over. He does and the final finished painting is much more in line with his later work - people who look similar to Henry Moore sculptures. He should have stopped halfway through the initial version as it was amazing, but he didn’t. He was searching for more and risked failure to achieve it. So the takeaway for me is that risk and failure are part of the artistic process as well.

My conclusion is that Picasso’s process was to go down a path and express his visual idea according to his style - but he didn’t stop there. He went further, pushing his style to greater individual expression through trial, error and experimentation.

The sad note of the film is that all the work he created during the filming was destroyed - the only record of it is in the film. Too bad, I would have happily taken those pieces for myself given the chance.
0 Comments
<<Previous

    About PK

    I am a visual artist and observer of art, especially contemporary art.

    Archives

    October 2020
    August 2020
    March 2020
    May 2019
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2017
    September 2016
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    April 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.